Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Baroque vs. Renaissance David


As Europe’s religions, politics, economics, and countless other aspects of life started to shift during the 17th century, so did the styles of art. Including some elements from the Renaissance style of art and rejecting others, the Baroque style emerged as a dramatic, beautiful, and powerful art movement. While Baroque art pushed against some of the conventions of the Renaissance, many of the elements of design carried over into the new art. For example, the church still played a significant and central role in the lives of European residents. The Catholic Church especially experienced an upsurge in interest and control through the Catholic Counter-Reformation. Beginning with the Council of Trent, the reformation affected art by putting forth strong purposes for its art and images. The art produced in relation to the church was hoped to help with one or more of several principles. The images should teach those faithful to the church about the involvement of the saints, be understood by the common man, and place an emphasis on the ritual of communion. Another similarity between Baroque art and Renaissance art is the influence of Classical forms and subject matter. Baroque art has less of an influence than the Renaissance did, but the compositions still use the classical styles seen in previous work. Lastly, the Baroque artists in Italy used many of the same materials for their artwork, including bronze and marble for statues, and oil paint on canvas. Some of the ways that Baroque art differs from Renaissance art are the darker color palette, which lends to the heightened drama and emotions as well as creating a higher contrast between light and dark colors. Baroque art focuses more on naturalism than did the Renaissance, creating a more realistic, and thus a more dramatic appearance.
A strong comparison of the Baroque style and the Renaissance style lies in the analysis of two statues of David, one by the Renaissance master Michelangelo, and the other by the Baroque master Bernini. Though of the same classical subject, and constructed from marble, the statues are strikingly different in form and presentation. Bernini’s David embraces the Baroque principle of heightened drama and emotion, showing the hero’s most engaged and dynamic position, mid-swing with his slingshot of rocks. Everything about the statue is filled with action, from his tensed face to the muscles on his legs. The body is depicted in a hero’s stance, and though very strong and powerful, the statue actually looks like a real person, instead of an idealized model. Michelangelo’s David is still portrayed as a hero, but in an idealized and stoic posture. While Bernini’s statue is in the thralls of action, Michelangelo’s work is leisurely standing, seemingly soaking in the glory of his victory over the giant. The influence of the Catholic Church also influenced art through its censorship, seen in the presence and absence of the nudity seen on the two statues. While the Renaissance work depicts a fully nude male figure, the Baroque piece has a bit more modesty with a slight piece of fabric to cover the genital area. 

5 comments:

  1. It's a good thing that you think Bernini's "David" looks like an actual person - this sculpture is actually a self-portrait of the artist!

    -Prof. Bowen

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are right, the church still played a huge role with both of these art pieces (and others as well). It truly amazes me how these two sculptures were created a century apart but still have that connection with the church. I am also glad you pointed out the “censorship” that the church had during the Baroque period with the nudity of Bernini’s David. I did the comparison of the two David’s as well and I didn’t even notice that detail, and it shows how different the influences were during the two eras.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like how you call it modesty I call it the baroque censorship by flying rags. I find it sort of amusing and almost distracting that a random rag or cloth has out of nowhere graced the genitals of all these otherwise very naturalistic nude images. I find myself actually creating a sport in my head where these images are running through a field catching flying bits of cloth with their genitals alone. I enjoyed your write up on the two Davids.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I too find the cloth a bit odd, or inconsistent with the rest of the sculpture. I do think, however, that Bernini's David portrays the character of the shepherd David well, rather than being an idealized warrior, he is a strong shepherd and a man of action. Each of the three statues of David we have seen so far portray a different aspect of David, but I like this one the most so far.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Like the other posters, I think the "modesty" portrayed by the cloth in Bernini's statue pulls the audience out of the realism a little bit. Baroque art went so far as to portray realistic moments at the height of drama, but the cloth covering David strays away from that. I also think it's interesting how much influence the church had over art during these times. It's still an influence today, but in that time, art was made based on standards from organizations like the Catholic church and the Council of Trent.

    ReplyDelete